Hoarding vs Sentimentalism: Understanding the Difference and When to Seek Help

As part of Hoarding Awareness Week, it is important to address the often-overlooked distinction between sentimental attachment and hoarding behaviour. While holding onto cherished items is a natural way to preserve memories and emotions, an inability to let go of possessions can sometimes signal a deeper issue. This article explores why we hold onto things, how sentimentalism differs from hoarding, and when it might be time to seek help.

For many people, possessions hold profound emotional significance. Objects are not merely physical items, they serve as symbols of relationships, achievements, and a sense of identity. A common reason for keeping items is their ability to evoke memories. For example, a gift from a loved one or a souvenir from a meaningful trip might remind us of specific moments or people. These items act as memory aids, allowing us to relive experiences and maintain connections to the past, even when the objects themselves have no practical purpose.

Another reason people struggle to part with belongings is that objects often reflect personal identity and self-expression. A family heirloom, for example, may represent a deep connection to cultural heritage and familial history. Similarly, a piece of memorabilia from a life milestone, such as a university graduation certificate or a medal from a race, becomes a symbol of personal achievement. These items reinforce one’s sense of self, making it emotionally difficult to discard them.

For some individuals, possessions provide a sense of emotional security, filling voids left by other areas of life. Those with attachment insecurities may form bonds with objects, relying on them for comfort and stability. A childhood blanket or a piece of jewellery from a deceased loved one, for example, may help someone feel grounded during stressful or vulnerable moments. These attachments can be particularly strong following life transitions or loss.

Difficulties in decision-making also play a significant role in why people retain items. For many, discarding objects triggers guilt or anxiety, particularly if the item was a gift. Concerns about disrespecting the giver or the fear of needing the item in the future can complicate decisions. This emotional conflict often results in keeping things “just in case,” even if they no longer serve a purpose.

In fast-paced environments like Singapore, possessions can also serve as coping mechanisms for stress. Books, for example, may symbolise lifelong learning and personal growth. Even if they remain unread, their presence offers reassurance, reflecting aspirations for success and self-improvement. Over time, this emotional attachment to objects can make it increasingly challenging to part with them.

While sentimentalism and hoarding may appear similar on the surface, they are fundamentally different. Sentimentalism is a healthy emotional attachment to meaningful items, whereas hoarding reflects a more pervasive difficulty with discarding possessions.

Hoarding often involves an overwhelming emotional attachment to a wide range of objects, many of which lack personal significance. For individuals with hoarding tendencies, possessions become extensions of their identity, and the idea of discarding them can cause intense distress. In contrast, sentimentalism typically involves selective attachment to items with specific emotional or symbolic value.

Another key distinction is the impact on one’s living space. Sentimental attachments generally coexist with an organised home, while hoarding results in clutter that disrupts the use of spaces. In severe cases, hoarding can render areas such as kitchens, bedrooms, or bathrooms unusable, compromising daily functionality.

Additionally, hoarding often includes a compulsive urge to acquire more items, even if they are unnecessary or redundant. This behaviour stems from an inability to regulate emotions and a perceived need to retain as much as possible. Sentimental individuals, on the other hand, are less likely to engage in compulsive acquisition and are more focused on preserving specific memories or experiences.

While it is normal to keep meaningful items, certain behaviours suggest that professional intervention may be needed. Extreme anxiety, sadness, or guilt at the thought of discarding possessions could indicate hoarding tendencies. When clutter begins to interfere with everyday life, such as making it difficult to cook in the kitchen or sleep in the bedroom, this is a red flag that the situation has become unmanageable.

Hoarding can also strain relationships, particularly when loved ones try to help clear spaces or suggest letting go of items. If possessions become a source of conflict or a primary way of coping with emotions, it may be time to seek support from a mental health professional.

In Singapore, where many families share close quarters, managing sentimental attachments can be a delicate task. Open and empathetic communication is key. Instead of criticising someone for holding onto items, try to understand the emotional value behind their possessions. Asking questions such as, “What makes this item special to you?” can create a safe space for discussion.

Setting shared goals for communal spaces can also help balance individual needs with family priorities. For example, designating a “memory corner” for sentimental items can provide a compromise, allowing someone to keep cherished belongings without cluttering shared areas. Families might also explore digital solutions, such as creating online photo albums to preserve memories while saving physical space.

If you struggle to manage sentimental items, consider these practical strategies:

  1. Curate a Memory Box: Designate a specific container for keepsakes, limiting the number of items you keep. This ensures that only the most meaningful possessions are retained.
  2. Digitise Memories: Scan or photograph items to create a digital archive. This allows you to preserve the emotional connection without needing physical space.
  3. Rotate Displays: Showcase a few sentimental items at a time, rotating them periodically. This keeps memories fresh without overwhelming your living space.
  4. Adopt a One-In-One-Out Rule: For every new sentimental item you acquire, let go of an old one. This practice helps manage clutter and ensures that each item has meaningful value.
  5. Focus on Stories: Record the memories behind your items in a journal or digital file. Often, it is the story, not the object, that holds true sentimental value.

Understanding the reasons behind our attachment to possessions can help us make more mindful choices. Cherishing sentimental items is a normal and healthy part of life, but when these attachments begin to disrupt daily functioning, it is important to seek help.

To meet with a professional psychologist or counsellor, call The Other Clinic at 8809 0659 or email us hello@theotherclinic.sg.

References:

Ball, A. D., & Tasaki, L. H. (1992). The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0102_04

Barzilay, R., Patrick, A., Calkins, M. E., Moore, T. M., Wolf, D. H., Benton, T. D., Leckman, J. F., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2019). Obsessive-Compulsive Symptomatology in Community Youth: Typical Development or a Red Flag for Psychopathology?. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(2), 277–286.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.038 

Cermele, J. A., Melendez-Pallitto, L., & Pandina, G. J. (2001). Intervention in compulsive hoarding. A case study. Behavior modification, 25(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445501252003 

Dommer, S. L., & Winterich, K. P. (2021). Disposing of the self: the role of attachment in the disposition process. Current opinion in psychology, 39, 43–47. doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.016 

Dozier, M. E., & Ayers, C. R. (2021). Object attachment as we grow older. Current opinion in psychology, 39, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.012 

Fritze, M. P., Marchand, A., Eisingerich, A. B., & Benkenstein, M. (2020). Access-based services as substitutes for material possessions: The role of psychological ownership. Journal of Service Research, 23(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520907691

Frost, R. O., Steketee, G., Tolin, D. F., Sinopoli, N., & Ruby, D. (2015). Motives for Acquiring and Saving in Hoarding Disorder, OCD, and Community Controls. Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, 4, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.12.006 

Gasiorowska, A., Folwarczny, M., & Otterbring, T. (2022). Anxious and status signaling: Examining the link between attachment style and status consumption and the mediating role of materialistic values. Personality and Individual Differences, 190, 111503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111503

Grisham, J. R., Frost, R. O., Steketee, G., Kim, H. J., Tarkoff, A., & Hood, S. (2009). Formation of attachment to possessions in compulsive hoarding. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(3), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.12.006

Huang, J., Xu, F., & Jiang, Y. (2023). I want to remember: Preference for visual intensity in sentimental purchases. Psychology & Marketing, 40, 1361–1371. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21819

Kings, C. A., Moulding, R., & Knight, T. (2017). You are what you own: Reviewing the link between possessions, emotional attachment, and the self-concept in hoarding disorder. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 14, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.05.005

Kwok, C., Grisham, J. R., & Norberg, M. M. (2018). Object attachment: Humanness increases sentimental and instrumental values. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 1132–1142. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.98

Mathes, B. M., Timpano, K. R., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B. (2020). Attachment theory and hoarding disorder: A review and theoretical integration. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 125, 103549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103549

Nordsletten, A. E., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2012). Hoarding versus collecting: Where does pathology diverge from play? Clinical Psychology Review, 32(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.003

Rogers, C. J., & Hart, R. (2021). Home and the extended self: Exploring associations between clutter and wellbeing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101553

Taylor, J. K., Theiler, S., Nedeljkovic, M., & Moulding, R. (2019). A qualitative analysis of emotion and emotion regulation in hoarding disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 520–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22715

Wallendorf, M., & Arnould, E. J. (1988). “My favorite things”: A cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/209134

Wan, E. W., & Chen, R. P. (2021). Anthropomorphism and object attachment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.009

Yang, A. X., Koo, M., & Hwang, J. (2022). “Remember me, will you?”: Overusing material gifts for interpersonal memory management. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32, 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1281

Yap, K., & Grisham, J. R. (2020). Object attachment and emotions in hoarding disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 100, 152179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152179

Discover more from The Other Clinic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading